STORY FROM JUDICIAL WATCH

In 1992, our own peoplesfreepress.com Jackelyn Giroux, filed a law suit, upon which three Marion County, Florida, Police Officers were subpoenaed  to give a deposition for a possible “obstruction of justice”  charge.  The three officers had given the sealed confession tapes of an incarcerated  female before she went to trial, to Republic Pictures and CBS-TV for a Movie of the Week Deal.

Although it was never yet proven that money changed hands, Giroux contends that the Officers should have been charged for “personal enrichment”, since their names were glorified in the Movie of the Week, and their names, plus the female charged, along with her live in lover, were the only true and actual  names used in the CBS Movie of the Week.

 

Adding insult to injury, the incarcerated female who confessed, did so to save her live in lover; and the Police Officers took this opportunity to give the  live in lover immunity….in exchange for enjoining with the Three Police Officers as a Package of their rights and  to join the CBS Movie of the Week package, even though the live in lover had many of the dead victims personal property on her and with her and she admittedly knew of the many murders, but never came forward, voluntarily!

 

Florida Attorney Robbie Bradshaw brokered the Republic Pictures and CBS Movie of the Week deal.  But he has never been asked to testify, and the only deposition he has ever given, was never transcribed.

 

Just recently, Giroux was given the taped telephone conversation between two of the three Marion County, Florida Police Officers, before and after they took their Depositions under oath, which Giroux respectfully asks the viewers of   peoplesfreepress, to openly comment:

 

DH:  Uh, but listen first thing you are going to be asked (on the deposition) is who did you talk to?  Okay,. I’m NOBODY.  Do you understand that?

 

BM:  Ok.

 

DH:  I’m serious now.

 

BM:  Yes sir.

 

DH:  I’m nobody!

 

BM:  Ok.

 

DH:  So you don’t know who you are talking too so just assume you are talking to NOBODY.

 

BM:  Ok.

 

DH:  Can you do that?

 

BM:  Oh yeah.  Ok.  What, what else?

 

DH;  Well I’m fixing.  I wrote down some stuff here.  But first thing was…

 

BM:  Did you go in by yourself?

 

DH:  Yeah I…

 

BM:  Did Bradshaw,  didn’t go with you or nothing?

 

DH:  No, he’s hell he’s gone on vacation.

 

BM:  Oh that’s right….ok

 

DH:  Uh, you know first thing was you know I knew the three of ya’ll had gotten together and talked since the subpoenas.  I said NO we haven’t.  Well remind your under oath.  I said look we haven’t talked.  I said I, I, I uh my secretary said there was a subpoena for me by the Wuornos case.  I called Bruce and he didn’t know too much about it.  Isn’t that right?

 

BM:  yeah

 

DH:  And I said, and I called Binegar and Binegar hadn’t seen his either and I said I hadn’t talked to those guys since.

 

BM:  Ok

 

DH:  He said you haven’t met with Ms. Wuornos uh, your attorney.  I said Yes I met with my attorney.  He said you haven’t met with those other guys?  I said No I haven’t.

 

BM:  Ok.

 

DH:  And uh, he said you haven’t talked to them.  I said No I haven’t.  You are going to be asked the same thing.

 

BM:  Ok

 

DH:  Any way I want, I just want to getcha and give you a Heads Up.

 

BM:  Ok

 

DH:  Basically, it’s pretty much like, like Bradshaw probably explained to you.  There, there going after the bucks.

 

BM:  Ok

                             ***

DH:  He really hammered on you know meeting with Bradshaw.  How many times did we meet and I said a couple of times is all I remember and I said the rest of it was independent phone calls.  I said even Bruce would talk to him.  Steve would talk to him or I would talk to him and we would run into each other in the halls.  He said well how many meetings did the three of ya’ll had?  I said, I said about what?  He said well just strictly about the movie deal.  I said we didn’t have any about the movie deal.  I aid we were in the break room and I said and I think I said, I said one of us said, I believe it was me said you know we ought to get Bradshaw to field these calls if they are going to start talking about you know waivers and contracts.

 

BM:  Um uh.

                             ***

DH:  Well that’s all right, I understand.  There’s no problem  I just wanted to make sure that you know I did whole lot of I don’t recall.  And he finally said uh, Ms Wuornos   Henry he said, you know especially with McClain and all them, I couldn’t remember details about that.  And he got real frustrated.  He said I can’t believe that, that you can’t recall the details of this.  I said, sire that was almost two years ago.  I said that will be two years ago, I said they wither came in January or February.

                             ***

 

BM:  Did he , did he did he ask about those morning meetings?  Uh, at the plantation and stuff.

 

DH:  Now he asked about meetings.  And I told him I couldn’t remember.  He said uh, well how many times did you meet with Bradshaw?  I said I don’t remember.  And he aid well, he said, he said, he said, if I remember, he said, he looked and he couldn’t find it and he said well some where there some notations of meetings here.  I said let me tell you something.

 

BM:  That was in the State Attorney’s Office report.

 

DM:  Yeah.  I said, I said that was two years ago.  I kept, I repeated that through the whole thing.  I said that was two years ago and I said I meet with a lot of people  And I said uh, you know I  met with a lot of people that were, that were writing you know stories on this thing.  And uh, I really honestly can’t remember.  I said, uh, I, I do remember having at least one meeting with him and I said there was possibly two and I said that’s all I can remember.

                           ***

BM:  I bet you are glad it is over with.

 

DH:  Oh man I am.  But uh you know I don’t know if Bradshaw helped you or not but he really helped my by, I I thought of every answer and there are some things he could’ve asked that you know, he didn’t ask and by God I didn’t give it to him.

                            ***

BM:  From what I understand, they were doing a police story and Jacqueline Giroux was doing a Wuornos story.

 

DH:  Yeah, but, but you don’t act like you understand nothing.

 

BM: ok.

 

DH:  Really.  I mean maybe, maybe yes the only questions he asked were about the police investigation, but don’t act like you know nothing about her.

 

BM”  Ok.

 

DH:  Cause he really wants that.  And Bradshaw said he can, what he can do with that is threaten to sue us, you know to bring us into a line.

 

BM”  Yeah.

 

DH:  You know hey you guys were a part of this damn thing.  Now we are going name you in the damn thing.

 

BM:  Yeah.  Well.

 

DH:  Because as long as we are stupid and innocent.  He got real frustrated when I told him, he said well when did you first know that Jacqueline Giroux had movie rights.  I aid I, I don’t know that she does.  Does Period!

                     ***

BM:  Ok.  All right Ms. Wuornos.  Nobody

 

DH:  And uh you know I mean, because he really wants to you know he really wants to show as much conspiracy as he can.

                  ***

DH:  Bruce what ever you do Son, don’t panic, and don’t give him anything that you don’t have too give him.

 

BM:  Ok, Major.

                   ***

 

DH:  Remember I’m Ms. Wuornos Nobody, you ain’t talked to me.

 

BM:  Ok, Ms. Wuronos Nobody     (PC-R. 201-205)

 

This assertion is more than amply addressed by the following excerpts from this second phone conversation of October 22 at 9:09 A.M.

 

BM:  Oh I thought I did too.  Um I didn’t enjoy the depo yesterday.,

 

DH.  Well I didn’t either.  But.

 

BM:  I didn’t enjoy it at all.  I can’t you know we got into it and, and they asked me particular questions about different things and some of the questions  I refused to answer.

 

DH:  Really.

 

BM:  Yeah…Cause, like I said I can’t lie about these things.

 

DH:  Right.

 

BM:  And Uh, I just refused to answer them.

 

DH:  Like what?

 

BM:  Well they asked me whether or not you had called me and I just refused to answer that.  I can’t lie.

 

Dh:  Well just tell them we did.  We only talked.

 

BM:  Well you, you know we talked before you told me that Ms. Wuornos Nobody called and I’m following your instructions.  But, but those questions  I, I don’t I don’t know what’s going to happen.  When this was over with he said that they….

 

DH:  See that just draws more attention.  I would have rather you have just went ahead and told them  Say yeah we you know we talked about it.  Well big deal.  I mean it ain’t against the law to talk about it

 

BM:  Yeah.  Well he said that there was a good chance that this was going to be settled without any further actions and, and that none of this, none of this does or anything will be made public.  So I’m kind of hoping that’s what happens.  But…I felt very uncomfortable um answering their questions.  And it was  they asked very pointed questions just like you said they would.

 

DH:  Yeah they did me too.  Well bruce there was no reason to tell them we haven’t talked.

 

BM:  But you told me not too.

 

DH:  No I didn’t tell you not too.  I said  hey this is Ms. Wuornos NOBODY.

 

 

BM:  Yeah.

 

DH:  You know I said you, in fact that I told you, you do, you do what you want to do.

 

BM:  Yeah.

 

DH:  But I was giving you away out of it if you wanted to say hey I talked to NOBODY. 

                               ***

DH>  So you hung it all on me.

 

BM:  No sir, I didn’t

 

DH:  You have Bruce.

BM:  Sir, Major.

 

DH:  Don’t sir me.  It’s a Dan and Bruce.  I’m not going to do anything.  I respect you and think you are the best.  Now bull shit on all this talking all this official road here. You know they I’m not going to do anything to you,  I love you like a brother, but you hug me out to dry.

                         ***

BM:  Ok  I’ll,  I’ll, I’ll get a copy of my deposition and, and I’ll make some corrections on it.  Because I want to make it, I want to make it right.

 

DH:  You don’t make any corrections, let me tell you, being you are playing this game this way.

 

BM:  No sire I’m not.

 

DH;  I’m not asking you to make any corrections on that deposition.  I’m not asking you to do anything   If you think you gave, you told it accurately, if your sure you told that stuff accurately then you, you leave it the way it is.

 

BM:  Yes sire.  I I wish I could retire today.  I wish I had never heard of Aileen Wuornos.

 

DH;  Well we all do.  But damn it, you know you find.

 

The fact that the live in girlfriend was in possession from some of the murder victim’s property, the fact that she had expressed remorse for giving safe shelter to her roommate cognizant of the string of killings which she later confessed to having committed constitute significant information leads in this case incriminatory of the live in lover which law enforcement chose to overlook.

This evidence may have definitely rendered a different outcome and a compelling basis and reason for mitigation namely the culpability from the logical un-indicted co conspirator of the live in girlfriend, who originally was considered a suspect as either a conspirator or an accessory in all of the killings.

What do you think  PEOPLESFREEPRESS.COM   People?